Author summary
30% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,086 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Libby Riddle results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Confirmation Bias , and Representativeness Heuristic , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 423 hits . Analysis detected 3,148 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,013 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 37% (3,973 of 6,244 authors). This Libby Riddle is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group. Libby Riddle
Author details
Total words: 4,013
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 10.5% 10.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.2% 2.2% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst