Author summary
10%3 analyzed articles/videos3,284 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Travers results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Overconfidence Bias, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 788 hits. Analysis detected 7,477 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,919 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 20% (5,334 of 6,611 authors). This Scott Travers is better (less manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group.
Scott Travers
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
20%Scott Travers (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 11,919
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

19% percentile
025507510019.3% percentile
1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate