Topic summary
48% 11 analyzed articles/videos 13,447 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fossil Fuels results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 4,894 hits . Analysis detected 44,212 faulty-reasoning hits from 48,088 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 19% (13,372 of 16,503 topics). This Fossil Fuels is better (less manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group. Fossil Fuels
Topic details
Total words: 48,088
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.0% percentile 1.9% BS Score11 analyzed articles48.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst