Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,081 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joseph Winters results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 1,254 hits . Analysis detected 9,905 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,324 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 35% (4,315 of 6,611 authors). This Joseph Winters is better (less manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group. Joseph Winters
Author details
Total words: 12,324
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.7% percentile 2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.2% 10.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst