Topic summary
10% 8 analyzed articles/videos 6,814 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Forensic Science results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 1,941 hits . Analysis detected 17,026 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,987 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 5% (15,062 of 15,765 topics). This Forensic Science is better (less manipulative) than 95.50% of the peer group. Forensic Science
Topic details
Total words: 24,987
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.5% percentile 1.4% BS Score8 analyzed articles25K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst