Author summary
12% 1 analyzed article/video 1,129 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conrad Wilson results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Self-Serving Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 319 hits . Analysis detected 1,513 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,387 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 26% (4,963 of 6,628 authors). This Conrad Wilson is better (less manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group. Conrad Wilson
Author details
Total words: 3,387
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.1% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.4% 9.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Special Pleading: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst