Topic summary
81% 20 analyzed articles/videos 12,071 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Florida results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 6,217 hits . Analysis detected 51,383 faulty-reasoning hits from 50,420 analyzed words across 20 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 26% (11,430 of 15,256 topics). This Florida is better (less manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group. Florida
Topic details
Total words: 50,420
Article count: 20
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.1% percentile 2.1% BS Score20 analyzed articles50.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.3% 12.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst