Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These R. Grant Gilmore III results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Overconfidence Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 412 hits . Analysis detected 2,858 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,792 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,235 authors). This R. Grant Gilmore III is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. R. Grant Gilmore III
Author details
Total words: 3,792
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.6% 7.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.6%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst