Topic summary
33% 24 analyzed articles/videos 12,103 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emergency Response results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 4,898 hits . Analysis detected 36,553 faulty-reasoning hits from 55,034 analyzed words across 24 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 5% (15,079 of 15,854 topics). This Emergency Response is better (less manipulative) than 95.10% of the peer group. Emergency Response
Topic details
Total words: 55,034
Article count: 24
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.9% percentile 1.4% BS Score24 analyzed articles55K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst