Topic summary
63% 12 analyzed articles/videos 5,716 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Drug Pricing results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 3,876 hits . Analysis detected 22,418 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,192 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 36% (10,095 of 15,755 topics). This Drug Pricing is better (less manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group. Drug Pricing
Topic details
Total words: 21,192
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.9% percentile 2.4% BS Score12 analyzed articles21.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 18.3% 18.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 4.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst