Author summary
4%2 analyzed articles/videos2,681 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kate Yandell results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Pessimism Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.3% saturation with 902 hits. Analysis detected 8,272 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,759 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 1% (6,294 of 6,354 authors). This Kate Yandell is better (less manipulative) than 99.10% of the peer group.
Kate Yandell
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
1%Kate Yandell (selected)1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 20,759
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

1% percentile
02550751000.9% percentile
0.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles20.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.2%4.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos