Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,770 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yuki Noguchi results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 1,782 hits. Analysis detected 8,761 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,831 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,260 of 6,628 authors). This Yuki Noguchi is worse (more manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group.
Yuki Noguchi
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
51%Yuki Noguchi (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,831
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

51% percentile
025507510050.8% percentile
2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.8%11.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 18.1%18.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.0%2.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.9%1.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Author 18.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 9.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate