Author summary
⁠66%3 analyzed articles/videos1,415 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tara Bannow results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.4% saturation with 817 hits. Analysis detected 2,838 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,646 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (2,830 of 6,170 authors). This Tara Bannow is worse (more manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group.
Tara Bannow
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠55%Tara Bannow (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,646
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

54% percentile
025507510054.1% percentile
2.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.3%8.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.0%1.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 22.4%22.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 8.7%8.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 22.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.7%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos