Topic summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,397 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dna Evidence results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 1,709 hits. Analysis detected 10,261 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,847 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 68% (5,071 of 15,447 topics). This Dna Evidence is worse (more manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510067.2% percentile
4.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.3%14.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 21.8%21.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.3%11.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 6.4%6.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 21.8%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate