Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,397 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dna Evidence results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 1,709 hits . Analysis detected 10,261 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,847 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 68% (5,071 of 15,447 topics). This Dna Evidence is worse (more manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group. Dna Evidence
Topic details
Total words: 7,847
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.2% percentile 4.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 21.8% 21.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.3% 11.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 21.8%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 4.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst