Utah forensic investigator and FBI analyst: DNA from Tyler Robinson’s partner Lance Twiggs found on weapons in Charlie Kirk murder case 53%

By OAN Staff Lillian Mann0% Brooke Mallory0%

7/7/2026, 7:01:42 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 35.8% saturation with 235 hits. Analysis detected 1,471 faulty-reasoning hits from 656 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 51.9% and a BS Rank of 53% (9,746 of 20,371 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 52.20% of the article peer group.

The DNA of Tyler Robinson, the alleged killer of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, as well as his transgender-identifying roommate and romantic partner, Lance Twiggs, was found on two items recovered near Utah Valley University, including the towel that was wrapped around the potential murder weapon, according to a Utah forensic examiner and FBI analyst Amanda Bakker. 
During day two of the preliminary hearing, Utah Department of Public Safety Sergeant Jennifer Faumuina took the stand to lay out the physical evidence trail and initial forensic tracking. 
Her testimony focused primarily on the collection of evidence, the chain of custody, and the preliminary identification of the DNA mixture. 
Specifically, Sgt. 
Faumuina testified to the following: 
* **Evidence Collection**: She described how investigators located and processed the primary evidence items: a Mauser 98 bolt-action rifle wrapped in a dark towel recovered from a wooded area near the Utah Valley University campus and a screwdriver recovered from the rooftop sniper’s perch at the Losee Center for Student Success. 
* **The Chain of Custody**: She detailed how the rifle, towel, and screwdriver were safely documented, packaged, and transferred over to the FBI and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) laboratories for advanced testing. 
* **Reading the DNA Findings**: Faumuina read aloud from the initial forensic tracking reports, testifying that the DNA found on the towel and screwdriver was a mixture belonging to exactly two people: one contributor was identified as suspect Tyler Robinson’s roommate, Twiggs, and the other was very likely Robinson himself. 
Her testimony effectively bridged the gap between the physical crime scene collection and the highly specific laboratory data later delivered by FBI DNA analyst Amanda Bakker. 
Bakker noted that Twiggs’ DNA was used solely for an elimination sample. 
Twiggs is still not accused or charged with any crime, according to Fox News. 
Along with the towel, Bakker confirmed that Robinson’s DNA was found on a screwdriver recovered from the rooftop of the University’s Losee Center, where he purportedly fired the fatal shot. 
Under cross-examination, Robinson’s defense attorney, Michael Burt, prodded the FBI analyst on the accuracy of the tests and the degradation of the samples. 
Nonetheless, Bakker highlighted that the results from the two male DNA samples indicated a high degree of probability. 
On Monday, the first day of the five-day preliminary hearing, prosecutors had showed several videos of the September 10, 2025 shooting, including graphic footage that was not revealed to the public. 
Sitting Judge Tony Graf appeared to flinch while viewing footage of the alleged assassination. 
Prosecutors alleged that Robinson wrapped his grandfather’s rifle in a towel after the shooting and then discarded it in a wooded area near the campus. 
As the hearing continues this week, prosecutors are expected to examine video testimony from Twiggs. 
Robinson purportedly confessed to the crime in a handwritten note left for Twiggs after the shooting. 
While Twiggs remains a non-suspect who has cooperated fully with authorities, the revelation of his DNA on the evidence is notable because it forms the absolute cornerstone of the defense’s strategy to create reasonable doubt. 
By seizing on the lopsided percentages  with Twiggs’ DNA making up 89% of the profile on the towel and 95% on the screwdriver  the defense is aggressively arguing that his presence is central to the crime, using cross-examinations to highlight that DNA alone cannot prove when an item was touched or who used it last. 
This forensic twist has also sparked an intense procedural battle in court, as defense attorneys unsuccessfully fought to force Twiggs to testify in person, while prosecutors counter that the shared living space easily explains the casual DNA transfer. 
The alleged killer, Robinson, has not entered a plea and faces the death penalty if convicted. 
Stay informed! 
Receive breaking news alerts directly to your inbox for free. 
Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 18.4%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 5.0%One America News Network: 4.6%Confirmation Bias18.4%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 1.1%One America News Network: 2.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.6%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 2.7%One America News Network: 3.9%Availability Heuristic6.6%This article: 7.8%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.8%One America News Network: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic7.8%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 1.7%One America News Network: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias2.7%This article: 35.8%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 12.0%One America News Network: 15.3%Framing Effect35.8%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.3%One America News Network: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.7%One America News Network: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 1.5%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 2.9%One America News Network: 4.3%Optimism Bias1.5%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 1.1%One America News Network: 1.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 34.3%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 10.7%One America News Network: 11.8%Negativity Bias34.3%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 2.2%One America News Network: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 1.1%One America News Network: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 1.5%One America News Network: 3.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.5%One America News Network: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 2.4%One America News Network: 5.3%Halo Effect4.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 1.3%One America News Network: 2.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.6%One America News Network: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 2.7%One America News Network: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.7%One America News Network: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 25.3%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 5.9%One America News Network: 6.3%Appeal to Authority25.3%This article: 2.4%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 1.6%One America News Network: 1.8%False Dilemma2.4%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.8%One America News Network: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.8%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 4.4%One America News Network: 5.4%Hasty Generalization5.8%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.6%One America News Network: 1.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 9.3%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 9.5%One America News Network: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion9.3%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 1.3%One America News Network: 1.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 3.4%One America News Network: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 13.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 1.0%One America News Network: 0.6%Burden of Proof13.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 8.7%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.3%Composition/Division8.7%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 1.7%One America News Network: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 12.5%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 1.8%One America News Network: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)12.5%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.8%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 2.2%One America News Network: 1.7%Unattributed Quote7.8%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 3.1%One America News Network: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 25.8%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 5.6%One America News Network: 5.2%Biased Writer Voice25.8%This article: 0.3%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 2.4%One America News Network: 1.1%Indoctrination0.3%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 3.8%One America News Network: 3.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%OAN Staff Lillian Mann: 2.7%One America News Network: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.3%

656 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers36%attributed speech422writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 56 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJennifer Faumuina • 51 words • 100.0% coverageJennifer Faumuina • 36 words • 0.0% coverageJennifer Faumuina • 50 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageAmanda Bakker • 12 words • 0.0% coverageFox News • 14 words • 0.0% coverageAmanda Bakker • 30 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Burt • 23 words • 0.0% coverageAmanda Bakker • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 57 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jennifer Faumuina

100%flagged-word coverage
137 attributed words59% of attributed speech90% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Biased Writer Voice-40.0 ptsWriter: 40.0%Jennifer Faumuina: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+37.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jennifer Faumuina: 37.2%37.2%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.6 ptsWriter: 3.6%Jennifer Faumuina: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-0.5 ptsWriter: 0.5%Jennifer Faumuina: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.