Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos3,190 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennifer Faumuina results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 1,255 hits. Analysis detected 10,094 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,208 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (25,771 of 35,700 keywords). This Jennifer Faumuina is better (less manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group.
Jennifer Faumuina
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
28%Jennifer Faumuina (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,208
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

28% percentile
025507510027.8% percentile
2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.6%10.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate