We Won't Know If Tyler Robinson Will Stand Trial Until September 14%

By Breccan F. Thies51%

7/10/2026, 7:51:31 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 193 hits. Analysis detected 1,116 faulty-reasoning hits from 982 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 30.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (18,241 of 21,182 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 86.10% of the article peer group.

Image Credit KSL News Utah / YouTube 
Whether Tyler Robinson will stand trial for the assassination of Charlie Kirk won’t be decided until September. 
Visit on Twitter @BreccanFThies 
The preliminary hearings used to determine whether Tyler Robinson will be tried for capital murder ended Friday, with no answer as to whether Robinson will stand trial for the assassination of Charlie Kirk. 
Judge Tony Graf will need to review all the evidence put before the court over the last five days to determine whether the bar of probable cause is met in order to send the case to trial. 
State prosecutors, Robinson and his counsel, and Graf will meet again on Sept. 1 at 10:00 a.m., after which Graf will, at some point, make the decision. 
The defense introduced one new witness Friday, Caitlin Oliver, a forensic biologist for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) who worked on the DNA analysis of evidence pertaining to the gun and ammunition allegedly used by Robinson. 
Robinson’s attorneys have exclusively called forensic analysts as witnesses in an attempt to create a level of doubt about forensic and DNA science as a whole. 
Defense attorney Michael Burt did the same Friday with Oliver, often reading from standard operating procedure (SOP) manuals and textbooks about the reliability of the science. 
He has pointed to the fact that there is no scientific way to be 100 percent certain of one’s DNA evidence on an item, but Oliver and others on the stand have said that is why they use a statistical representation of the possibility that someone’s DNA is on a piece of evidence  as opposed to another person’s  instead of claiming absolute certainty. 
For numerous pieces of evidence, including multiple locations on the rifle, cartridges, and other items, the likelihood that the DNA is Robinson’s has been extraordinarily high. 
Utah State Bureau of Investigation Sgt. 
Jennifer Faumuina, the lead for the evidence response team in the Kirk case, testified, for example, that the DNA profile obtained from swabs of the trigger and trigger guard is “at least 1 trillion times more likely if it originated from Tyler Robinson as a major component and three unrelated unknown individuals than if it originated from four unrelated unknown individuals.” 
DNA testimony linking ROBINSON to the .30-06 rifle, per Utah SBI Sgt. 
FAUMUINA, team lead for the evidence response team. 
Swabs of stock and bolt of rifle: 
"The DNA profiles are at least 1 trillion times more likely if they originated from Tyler Robinson, Exhibit 7.1 as a… 
- Breccan F. 
Thies (@BreccanFThies) July 9, 2026 
Responding to questions from Burt, Oliver also testified that the true number of contributors of DNA can never be known, and that no testing could speak to the activity leading to the DNA’s existence on an item. 
Some, including TPUSA’s Andrew Kolvet and Fox News pundit Kayleigh McEnany, have pointed out that this trial is taking an enormous amount of time, and that proceedings like this week’s are often completed more quickly in much of the United States. 
After the hearings ended Friday, the Kirk family filed a motion requesting a prompt determination of probable cause, stating it should be made “no later” than Sept. 
1. 
New filing from KIRK family asking for a quick probable cause determination in whether to send the ROBINSON capital murder case to trial: 
The family “respectfully request that this Court promptly enter its probable cause determination based on the overwhelming evidence presented… pic.twitter.com/pykX7Mcysn 
- Breccan F. 
Thies (@BreccanFThies) July 10, 2026 
Graf has also been the target of some online ire for his occasional rulings against the Kirk family in motions to release certain exhibits to be played, at least to the courtroom gallery. 
While Graf has opened much of the hearings up to the public, including to a livestream, he became more reserved Friday after there was an unauthorized filming of an exhibit Thursday, leading him to shut down the video capture of any future exhibit Friday. 
He said the court retains the ability to alter that decision when it reconvenes in September. 
“The conclusion of the preliminary hearing marks an important step forward in the pursuit of justice for Charlie. 
Our family is grateful for the prayers, support, and kindness that has been extended to us, especially through these unimaginably painful and emotionally demanding proceedings,” a statement released by the Kirk family reads. 
“As difficult as these last few days have been, it brings our family comfort to know that the world has witnessed the overwhelming evidence of what occurred to Charlie that day. 
Nothing will ever undo the loss of our beloved Charlie. 
As this case moves into its next phase, we pray that truth will continue to be heard through a process that is fair, transparent, and grounded in the facts.” 
Breccan F. 
Thies is the White House correspondent for The Federalist. 
He is a co-recipient of the 2025 Dao Prize for Excellence in Investigative Journalism. 
As an investigative journalist, he previously covered education and culture issues for the Washington Examiner and Breitbart News. 
He holds a degree from the University of Virginia and is a 2022 Claremont Institute Publius Fellow. 
You can follow him on X: @BreccanFThies. 
Charlie Kirk assassination 
Utah Valley University 
Here’s What You Need To Know About The Charlie Kirk Assassination Trial, Day 4 
Trump’s Immigration Enforcement Really Is Slashing Violent Crime 
Here’s What You Need To Know About The Charlie Kirk Assassination Trial, Day 3 
Let’s Count The Ways Democrats Are Lying About ICE 
MIA Mitch McConnell Must Explain His Absence Or Retire 
Increasing Number Of Ivy League Students Can’t Even Read, So Let’s Stop Calling Them ‘Elite’ 
Propaganda Press Buries Illegal Alien’s Alleged Attempt To Run Over ICE Agent Before Fatal Shooting 
5 Top Reasons The Smithsonian American History Museum Is A National Disgrace 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.7%Breccan F. Thies: 6.6%The Federalist: 8.5%Confirmation Bias8.7%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 1.2%The Federalist: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Breccan F. Thies: 3.1%The Federalist: 3.4%Availability Heuristic4.2%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 1.0%The Federalist: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.5%The Federalist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 1.6%The Federalist: 2.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 12.7%The Federalist: 10.1%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 4.4%Breccan F. Thies: 0.6%The Federalist: 0.4%Loss Aversion4.4%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.5%The Federalist: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.9%Breccan F. Thies: 0.7%The Federalist: 1.0%Optimism Bias7.9%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.7%The Federalist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 19.7%Breccan F. Thies: 7.8%The Federalist: 12.2%Negativity Bias19.7%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.7%The Federalist: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 1.7%The Federalist: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 3.4%Breccan F. Thies: 0.1%The Federalist: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias3.4%This article: 0.9%Breccan F. Thies: 3.6%The Federalist: 4.0%In-Group Bias0.9%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 1.6%The Federalist: 2.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Breccan F. Thies: 2.3%The Federalist: 2.3%Halo Effect5.9%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.7%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.7%The Federalist: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.3%The Federalist: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Breccan F. Thies: 2.6%The Federalist: 5.3%Ad Hominem3.7%This article: 1.5%Breccan F. Thies: 2.4%The Federalist: 2.7%Straw Man1.5%This article: 8.6%Breccan F. Thies: 9.0%The Federalist: 5.1%Appeal to Authority8.6%This article: 0.9%Breccan F. Thies: 1.9%The Federalist: 2.8%False Dilemma0.9%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.9%The Federalist: 2.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.4%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.3%Breccan F. Thies: 7.6%The Federalist: 11.3%Hasty Generalization2.3%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.5%The Federalist: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.9%Breccan F. Thies: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.6%Bandwagon0.9%This article: 10.1%Breccan F. Thies: 6.4%The Federalist: 8.1%Appeal to Emotion10.1%This article: 5.2%Breccan F. Thies: 2.0%The Federalist: 3.2%Begging the Question5.2%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 2.4%The Federalist: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.5%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.7%Breccan F. Thies: 1.1%The Federalist: 1.1%Burden of Proof2.7%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.4%The Federalist: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.7%Breccan F. Thies: 2.1%The Federalist: 2.8%Anecdotal5.7%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 1.6%The Federalist: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.3%The Federalist: 0.8%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.2%Breccan F. Thies: 3.6%The Federalist: 3.1%Unattributed Quote4.2%This article: 8.4%Breccan F. Thies: 3.0%The Federalist: 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection8.4%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 10.5%The Federalist: 19.8%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 3.6%The Federalist: 5.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Breccan F. Thies: 12.2%The Federalist: 15.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias3.4%This article: 1.1%Breccan F. Thies: 1.0%The Federalist: 1.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.1%

982 words analyzed.

Speakers

10speakers38%attributed speech605writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageKSL News Utah • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Burt • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 65 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageUtah State Bureau of Investigation • 6 words • 0.0% coverageJennifer Faumuina • 61 words • 100.0% coverageUtah State Bureau of Investigation • 12 words • 0.0% coverageUtah State Bureau of Investigation • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageBreccan F. Thies • 5 words • 0.0% coverageCaitlin Oliver • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageKirk family • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageKirk family • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageBreccan F. Thies • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageTony Graf • 16 words • 0.0% coverageKirk family • 18 words • 0.0% coverageKirk family • 33 words • 0.0% coverageKirk family • 31 words • 0.0% coverageKirk family • 10 words • 0.0% coverageKirk family • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageThe Federalist • 9 words • 0.0% coverageBreccan F. Thies • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageUtah Valley University • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Kirk family

100%flagged-word coverage
168 attributed words45% of attributed speech43% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Unattributed Quote+8.4 ptsWriter: 3.5%Kirk family: 11.9%11.9%Politically Right Leaning -5.5 ptsWriter: 5.5%Kirk family: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-3.5 ptsWriter: 3.5%Kirk family: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.8 ptsWriter: 1.8%Kirk family: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.