Keyword summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos4,583 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charlie Kirk Assassination results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 1,666 hits. Analysis detected 11,008 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,780 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (34,128 of 37,536 keywords). This Charlie Kirk Assassination is better (less manipulative) than 90.90% of the peer group.
Charlie Kirk Assassination
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 16,780
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

9% percentile
02550751009.1% percentile
1.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles16.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos