What You Need To Know About The Kirk Assassination Trial 8%

By Breccan F. Thies50%

7/8/2026, 11:45:30 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 204 hits. Analysis detected 1,052 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,080 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 25.2% and a BS Rank of 8% (18,860 of 20,472 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 92.10% of the article peer group.

Image Credit KSL News Utah / YouTube 
Tyler Robinson turning himself in to authorities and Lance Twiggs’ interview with law enforcement were focal points during Wednesday’s hearing. 
Visit on Twitter @BreccanFThies 
An interview with Lance Twiggs, the roommate and alleged “transgender”-identifying lover of accused Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson, took center stage on day three of the preliminary hearings prior to Robinson’s capital murder trial. 
Another crucial piece of evidence, in direct contrast to some theories online questioning Robinson’s involvement, is that Robinson turned himself in to Washington County law enforcement at around 9:00 p.m. on Sept. 11, the day after he allegedly shot Kirk. 
He was there with his parents, and all were interviewed by the authorities. 
As with hearing days one and two , more people were introduced Wednesday. 
Lauren Hunt , Deputy County Attorney. 
According to her bio, she has “practiced law since 2013 and currently serves as a criminal prosecutor with the Utah County Attorney’s Office. 
For nearly eight years, she has prosecuted a wide range of misdemeanor and felony cases  including theft, assault, attempted murder, and homicide  while developing a particular specialization in sexual offense cases. 
She is a member of the Office’s Special Victims Unit, where she focuses on crimes involving vulnerable victims.” 
Jeffrey Neiman is the Kirk family’s attorney. 
Until Wednesday, he had yet to speak up in the hearings, but when redactions were being made to the video of the Twiggs interview , he said the family would like the interview in its entirety to be played “for the world to see.” 
“To not be transparent here, to not be open, to not let the world see what happened will create doubt and distrust in the judicial system, and that’s not what anybody wants,” he said. 
“That’s not what any of us believe should happen here. 
And we’d ask the court to consider the position of the family in making its ultimate decision.” 
Michael Judd is an attorney representing the interests of the news media. 
The media is not a party to the case, but has an interest in certain aspects. 
While Judge Tony Graf has allowed quite a bit of transparency with regard to the media, Judd has argued that cameras should be able to capture a greater portion of the exhibits than has been allowed in some cases. 
State witness 4: Brian Davis, an agent with the Utah State Bureau of Investigation with 18 years at the agency. 
Davis has a total of 27 years in law enforcement with experience in violent crime, homicides, sex crimes, drug crimes, firearm crimes, white collar crime, and fraud. 
He said he has worked more than 60 homicide cases. 
Davis was assigned to be a case agent on the Kirk assassination investigation along with Agent David Hull. 
Davis was called into the Washington County Sheriff’s Department after being notified that Robinson wanted to turn himself in. 
Robinson turned himself in, accompanied by his parents and a family friend, around 9:00 p.m. 
Davis arrived at the department around 11:30 p.m. 
Robinson’s parents were interviewed separately, but simultaneously. 
Robinson himself was detained officially on Sept. 12 at around 4:00 a.m. 
Judge Tony Graf allowed a short video of Robinson being held to be played for media cameras in court. 
Video of ROBINSON being held, detained, in Washington County, Utah, after turning himself in. 
@FDRLST pic.twitter.com/Bn0hULL36H 
- Breccan F. 
Thies (@BreccanFThies) July 8, 2026 
While that video was not much of an issue, a separate video of an interview with Twiggs took up nearly the rest of the hearing. 
Twiggs was interviewed by Ryan McBride, one of the Utah County attorneys prosecuting the case against Robinson, at least once. 
There are a total of two Twiggs interviews, one that took place on Sept. 12, 2025, and another that took place on April 20, 2026. 
In both interviews, Twiggs was given “use immunity,” meaning he cannot be prosecuted based on the information provided in the interview  but can be prosecuted based on information not covered in the interview. 
Robinson attorney Richard Novak objected to the video interview being played publicly, and the state prosecutors asked for only the audio to be played. 
We are once again talking about closing down the proceedings related to a new exhibit: a video interview of Lance TWIGGS to be played in the courtroom. 
Media attorney Michael JUDD is arguing that the interview is important enough that the public deserves to see it. 
After a considerable amount of deliberation, Graf decided that significant portions of the video should be redacted for public view, but that he would consider the full video in his probable cause determination as to whether this case should go to trial. 
The redactions made by Graf concern discussion of the contents of text messages, Discord chats, and a “note,” all of which prosecutors say they will move to enter into the record as well. 
They are not yet deemed admissible. 
For those anticipating the TWIGGS testimony, it appears that STATE attorney HUNT said many of the TWIGGS questions will be asked when Utah SBI Agent FAUMUINA retakes the stand after Agent DAVIS’s testimony. 
STATE attorneys say FAUMUINA could take the stand today, but it will… 
Day four of the hearing on Thursday is set to open with the playing of the redacted video, with audio only captured by news media. 
The hearing is also likely to go into much more detail about Twiggs. 
Breccan F. 
Thies is the White House correspondent for The Federalist. 
He is a co-recipient of the 2025 Dao Prize for Excellence in Investigative Journalism. 
As an investigative journalist, he previously covered education and culture issues for the Washington Examiner and Breitbart News. 
He holds a degree from the University of Virginia and is a 2022 Claremont Institute Publius Fellow. 
You can follow him on X: @BreccanFThies. 
Charlie Kirk assassination 
Utah Valley University 
Let’s Count The Ways Democrats Are Lying About ICE 
Here’s What You Need To Know About The Charlie Kirk Assassination Trial, Day 2 
Here’s What You Need To Know About The Charlie Kirk Assassination Trial, Day 1 
Alaska Fraud Unit Uncovers Alleged Medicaid Schemes Designed To Steal Millions From Taxpayers 
Democrats Created The Destructive MeToo Standard. 
They Continue Suffering For It 
Trump Admin Launches Probe Into H-1B Visa Fraudsters Stealing Jobs From Americans 
Judge Who Obstructed ICE Avoids Prison Because She’s A ‘Good Person’ Who Was ‘Upset’ By Enforcing Laws 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.7%Breccan F. Thies: 6.6%The Federalist: 8.5%Confirmation Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 1.2%The Federalist: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Breccan F. Thies: 3.1%The Federalist: 3.4%Availability Heuristic3.1%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 1.0%The Federalist: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.5%The Federalist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 1.6%The Federalist: 2.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 6.8%Breccan F. Thies: 12.7%The Federalist: 10.2%Framing Effect6.8%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.6%The Federalist: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.5%The Federalist: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 1.1%Breccan F. Thies: 0.7%The Federalist: 1.0%Optimism Bias1.1%This article: 0.5%Breccan F. Thies: 0.7%The Federalist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.5%This article: 7.3%Breccan F. Thies: 7.8%The Federalist: 12.2%Negativity Bias7.3%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.7%The Federalist: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 1.7%The Federalist: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.1%The Federalist: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 3.6%The Federalist: 4.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 1.6%The Federalist: 2.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%Breccan F. Thies: 2.3%The Federalist: 2.3%Halo Effect6.9%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.7%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.5%Breccan F. Thies: 0.7%The Federalist: 1.2%Recency Bias3.5%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.3%The Federalist: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 2.6%The Federalist: 5.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 2.4%The Federalist: 2.8%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.6%Breccan F. Thies: 9.0%The Federalist: 5.2%Appeal to Authority9.6%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 1.9%The Federalist: 2.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.9%The Federalist: 2.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.4%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.4%Breccan F. Thies: 7.6%The Federalist: 11.4%Hasty Generalization1.4%This article: 3.7%Breccan F. Thies: 0.5%The Federalist: 0.4%Red Herring3.7%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.6%Breccan F. Thies: 6.4%The Federalist: 8.2%Appeal to Emotion7.6%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 2.0%The Federalist: 3.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.5%Breccan F. Thies: 2.4%The Federalist: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.5%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.5%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 1.1%The Federalist: 1.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.4%The Federalist: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 2.1%The Federalist: 2.7%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.2%Breccan F. Thies: 1.6%The Federalist: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.2%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.0%The Federalist: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.3%The Federalist: 0.8%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.9%Breccan F. Thies: 3.6%The Federalist: 3.1%Unattributed Quote9.9%This article: 3.1%Breccan F. Thies: 3.0%The Federalist: 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection3.1%This article: 18.9%Breccan F. Thies: 10.5%The Federalist: 19.9%Biased Writer Voice18.9%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 3.6%The Federalist: 5.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Breccan F. Thies: 0.2%The Federalist: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%Breccan F. Thies: 12.2%The Federalist: 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias4.5%This article: 1.2%Breccan F. Thies: 1.0%The Federalist: 1.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.2%

1080 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers11%attributed speech965writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageJeffrey Neiman • 44 words • 100.0% coverageJeffrey Neiman • 34 words • 100.0% coverageJeffrey Neiman • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJeffrey Neiman • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageBrian Davis • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jeffrey Neiman

90%flagged-word coverage
105 attributed words91% of attributed speech52% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Unattributed Quote+35.4 ptsWriter: 6.5%Jeffrey Neiman: 41.9%41.9%Biased Writer Voice+25.3 ptsWriter: 16.6%Jeffrey Neiman: 41.9%41.9%Quote-first Misdirection+32.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jeffrey Neiman: 32.4%32.4%Politically Right Leaning -5.1 ptsWriter: 5.1%Jeffrey Neiman: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.3 ptsWriter: 1.3%Jeffrey Neiman: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.