Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,956 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dna Evidence results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 1,495 hits . Analysis detected 9,759 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,144 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 61% (14,374 of 36,018 keywords). This Dna Evidence is worse (more manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group. Dna Evidence
Keyword details
Total words: 7,144
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.1% percentile 3.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.0% 14.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 20.9% 20.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 20.9%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst