Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,956 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dna Evidence results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 1,495 hits. Analysis detected 9,759 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,144 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 61% (14,374 of 36,018 keywords). This Dna Evidence is worse (more manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group.
Dna Evidence
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
61%Dna Evidence (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

60% percentile
025507510060.1% percentile
3.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.0%14.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.6%5.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 20.9%20.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 20.9%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate