Author summary
36% 2 analyzed articles/videos 948 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Willoughby Mariano results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 384 hits . Analysis detected 2,716 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,464 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 48% (3,320 of 6,364 authors). This Willoughby Mariano is better (less manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group. Willoughby Mariano
Author details
Total words: 3,464
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.8% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.1% 11.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.0% 2.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst