Topic summary
25% 9 analyzed articles/videos 8,378 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Covid 19 results contain 55 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 3,817 hits . Analysis detected 41,796 faulty-reasoning hits from 49,763 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (14,120 of 15,359 topics). This Covid 19 is better (less manipulative) than 91.90% of the peer group. Covid 19
Topic details
Total words: 49,763
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.1% percentile 1.5% BS Score9 analyzed articles49.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst