Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 795 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michelle Grattan results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Biased Writer Voice , and Hindsight Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 395 hits . Analysis detected 3,210 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,180 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (2,686 of 6,582 authors). This Michelle Grattan is worse (more manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group. Michelle Grattan
Author details
Total words: 3,180
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.2% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 8.9% 8.9% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 8.4% 8.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 12.4% 12.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 12.4%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 8.9%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.8%, sitewide 5.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst