Topic summary
79% 19 analyzed articles/videos 8,332 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corporate Finance results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 4,480 hits . Analysis detected 51,606 faulty-reasoning hits from 46,901 analyzed words across 19 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (11,758 of 15,498 topics). This Corporate Finance is better (less manipulative) than 75.90% of the peer group. Corporate Finance
Topic details
Total words: 46,901
Article count: 19
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.1% percentile 2.0% BS Score19 analyzed articles46.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst