Author summary
46% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,192 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Gerut results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 694 hits . Analysis detected 6,848 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,768 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 33% (4,462 of 6,606 authors). This Amanda Gerut is better (less manipulative) than 67.50% of the peer group. Amanda Gerut
Author details
Total words: 8,768
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.5% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst