Topic summary
72% 10 analyzed articles/videos 3,862 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corporate Earnings results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 1,651 hits . Analysis detected 16,833 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,531 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 30% (11,597 of 16,559 topics). This Corporate Earnings is better (less manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group. Corporate Earnings
Topic details
Total words: 17,531
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.0% percentile 2.2% BS Score10 analyzed articles17.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst