IBM stock plunges 23% as it says clients are spending less on its AI products 5%

By Will Martin85% Georgia Hennessy0%

7/14/2026, 12:09:54 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 41.1% saturation with 179 hits. Analysis detected 823 faulty-reasoning hits from 435 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 19.8% and a BS Rank of 5% (20,893 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 95.50% of the article peer group.

IBM blamed clients spending more on AI hardware, like memory and servers, for its poor results. 
Connie Zhou for IBM 
IBM stock tanked in premarket trading on Tuesday after worse-than-expected Q2 results. 
The company's stock was set to open down almost 23%. 
"This quarter we faltered," IBM CEO Arvind Krishna said in a letter to investors. 
IBM shares tanked in premarket trading on Tuesday after the tech giant reported worse-than-expected results and said customers were cutting back spending on its AI infrastructure and software products. 
The company's stock was set to open down almost 23% as of around 7:45 a.m. 
ET, an hour and a half before the market open. 
Having closed at $290 per share on Monday, the stock was set to open at $224 on Tuesday. 
The precipitous drop in IBM's stock came after it reported a second-quarter "shortfall" in the performance of its software and infrastructure division, linked to the rollout of its new z17 mainframes, which are designed to process AI workloads. 
"This quarter we faltered," IBM CEO Arvind Krishna said in a letter to investors released Tuesday. 
"We did not adapt and move quickly enough, and numerous large deals failed to close on the timelines we expected, driving the majority of our shortfall." 
Krishna said that a major factor in the lower-than-expected performance was clients cutting spending on IBM products and reprioritizing their capex spend on "servers, storage, and memory purchases" ahead of "expected price increases." 
Behind this change in spending patterns is a global shortage of memory chips that has driven up hardware prices since late 2025. 
Memory giants like Samsung, SK Hynix , and Micron have shifted production toward the specialized chips that power AI data centers, and that capacity is effectively sold out for 2026 under long-term contracts. 
The result is a squeeze on the everyday memory used by servers, PCs, and phones. 
Micron's CEO has said he expects "tight conditions to persist beyond calendar 2027 as a result of AI-driven demand across all segments coupled with structural supply constraints." 
The prospect of further price rises appears to have prompted IBM's clients to prioritize hardware procurement over the software and mainframe purchases the company had anticipated. 
Krishna said in his letter to investors that while IBM had expected some changes in clients' spending patterns, the company "did not anticipate the magnitude of the capex reprioritization." 
IBM reported revenues of $17.2 billion across the company in the second quarter, up 1%, but behind analyst expectations. 
Revenues in the infrastructure division were down 7%. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 20.2%Will Martin: 0.0%Business Insider: 2.5%Confirmation Bias20.2%This article: 4.1%Will Martin: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.7%Anchoring Bias4.1%This article: 11.3%Will Martin: 2.9%Business Insider: 3.4%Availability Heuristic11.3%This article: 8.7%Will Martin: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic8.7%This article: 6.0%Will Martin: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.9%Hindsight Bias6.0%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 0.0%Business Insider: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Will Martin: 10.2%Business Insider: 5.0%Framing Effect3.4%This article: 2.3%Will Martin: 2.0%Business Insider: 0.8%Loss Aversion2.3%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.8%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 0.5%Business Insider: 3.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 13.6%Will Martin: 6.6%Business Insider: 1.6%Pessimism Bias13.6%This article: 15.6%Will Martin: 11.2%Business Insider: 4.6%Negativity Bias15.6%This article: 17.2%Will Martin: 3.8%Business Insider: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias17.2%This article: 6.0%Will Martin: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error6.0%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 3.8%Business Insider: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 1.1%Business Insider: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 2.3%Business Insider: 3.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.4%Will Martin: 0.0%Business Insider: 1.3%Recency Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.2%Will Martin: 20.8%Business Insider: 3.3%Appeal to Authority6.2%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 2.0%Business Insider: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 3.9%Business Insider: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 1.8%Business Insider: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 0.0%Business Insider: 4.0%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 10.6%Business Insider: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 5.7%Business Insider: 3.1%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 3.7%Business Insider: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 41.1%Will Martin: 2.6%Business Insider: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)41.1%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 6.7%Will Martin: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.2%Burden of Proof6.7%This article: 7.6%Will Martin: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Appeal to Nature7.6%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 0.0%Business Insider: 3.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.6%Will Martin: 1.6%Business Insider: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.6%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 2.0%Business Insider: 1.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 3.7%Will Martin: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection3.7%This article: 3.4%Will Martin: 5.2%Business Insider: 3.3%Biased Writer Voice3.4%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 10.9%Business Insider: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 0.0%Business Insider: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Will Martin: 1.6%Business Insider: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

435 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers37%attributed speech274writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageIBM • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageArvind Krishna • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageArvind Krishna • 16 words • 100.0% coverageArvind Krishna • 26 words • 0.0% coverageArvind Krishna • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageMicron • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageArvind Krishna • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Arvind Krishna

100%flagged-word coverage
118 attributed words73% of attributed speech89% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Quote-first Misdirection+13.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Arvind Krishna: 13.6%13.6%Biased Writer Voice-5.5 ptsWriter: 5.5%Arvind Krishna: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.