Topic summary
65% 8 analyzed articles/videos 7,875 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Resilience results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 3,319 hits . Analysis detected 25,121 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,076 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 9% (14,068 of 15,448 topics). This Community Resilience is better (less manipulative) than 91.10% of the peer group. Community Resilience
Topic details
Total words: 35,076
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.9% percentile 1.6% BS Score8 analyzed articles35.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst