The Guardian81%
New Orleans residents on warning to abandon sinking city: ‘Nobody wants to leave home’ 56%
By Oliver Milman0%
7/1/2026, 12:00:37 PM
BS Summary: This article contains 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and False Dilemma, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 375 hits. Analysis detected 3,344 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,435 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 53.2% and a BS Rank of 56% (9,802 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 55.20% of the article peer group.
When a study in May concluded that New Orleans had hit a “point of no return” due to the climate crisis that would require people to eventually retreat from their storied yet ultimately doomed city, the local reaction was swift and fiery.
The onward march of rising seas around a sinking city was unsettling, but the study was “more focused on generating publicity and clickbait headlines” than coming up with solutions, said Helena Moreno, New Orleans’s mayor.
There was flooding in Miami, and wildfires and earthquakes near San Fransisco, Moreno pointed out, “yet no serious movement exists to declare those cities lost causes”.
Others were less diplomatic.
“It’s really the most ridiculous study I have ever seen,” said Gordon Dove, the head of Louisiana’s coastal restoration agency, who took aim at Torbjörn Törnqvist, the lead researcher.
“I don’t think he knows what he’s talking about,” Dove fumed.
Some locals took to posting defiant video clips of themselves near New Orleans’s levees (carrying captions such as “STOP TELLING US TO MOVE”), or lamented a “modern day redlining of an entire city” and asked “what will happen ” when investors, insurers and young families read this” and act accordingly.
Others decried the climate denial by state and federal governments that had led to such a situation.
But of the torrent of New Orleanians who got in touch with Törnqvist about the study, typically after reading about it in the Guardian, most had grasped the precarity of the city’s future, according to the Tulane University academic, who is a leading expert on the fraying marshlands of the Mississippi Delta.
“I’ve found it encouraging – we’ve had more constructive reactions than negative ones,” Törnqvist said.
“Of course it’s upsetting to hear this, but cities like New Orleans have an expiration date.
We’ve already crossed a tipping point of survivability for our coastal wetlands.
The rate of sea level rise is way too high.
“We will be surrounded by open water and New Orleans will be like a fortress in the Gulf of Mexico.
It will be like Venice, a few islands in a lagoon.”
A decision by Jeff Landry, Louisiana’s Republican governor, to cancel a $3bn project to naturally revive the vanishing coastline with sediment carried by the Mississippi is a further “death penalty” for New Orleans, Törnqvist argues.
But for some in New Orleans, the relocation question can no longer wait.
The city is already losing people – shrinking in four of the five last years, now at just more than 360,000 people – for a host of reasons.
That includes some of the highest rates of home insurance in the country due to the risks of living on a bowl-shaped spit of marshland below sea level, surrounded by water in a hurricane zone.
“The whole concept of relocation is overwhelming for people.
They don’t like to think about it,” said Picou, who moved to Opelousas, which sits 130 miles north-west of New Orleans at a more comfortable 66ft (20 meters) above sea level.
“But there’s no escaping this climate.
Towns are going to have the opportunity to be receiver communities and they need to start thinking about that now.”
In a striking new response to this prospect, a loose coalition of New Orleans community groups have in recent weeks traveled to assess two cities that could provide potential escape routes – Vicksburg and Natchez, both situated roughly three hours away by car in neighboring Mississippi.
Debra Campbell, the chair of the main non-profit – A Community Voice, which has about 9,000 members in New Orleans – said there’s nascent interest in acquiring or building properties for New Orleanians to flee to should they be displaced by a storm similar to the devastating Hurricane Katrina, which hit the city in 2005.
“We’re only going to leave if we’re forced to leave due to hurricanes, flooding and the heavy industrialization of our neighborhoods,” Campbell said.
In arranged meetings, residents and officials in Vicksburg and Natchez welcomed the idea of an influx from New Orleans and discussed the renovation of empty homes and use of public facilities as temporary shelters, she added.
“I told them: ‘We’re coming.
We’re coming in an exodus,’” Campbell said.
“‘We’re not coming to lay on your leg – we’re looking for employment.
We want our kids in school.
Once we’re pushed out of here, we have to have somewhere to go.’”
The Mississippi cities “don’t have what we have” in terms of climate-driven threats, she said.
“We need investment,” said Arthur Johnson, the chief executive of the Lower Ninth Ward Center for Sustainable Engagement and Development, serving an area badly ravaged by Katrina.
“If you talk about leaving, it can be an excuse to not have economic development because you don’t have enough people, particularly in this community.
Where do you move anyway?
Where’s affordable?”
The physical manifestation of the determination to hold back the rising seas is the string of fortifications that ring New Orleans.
A linchpin in the system is the Lake Borgne surge barrier, a colossal, 1.8-mile-long concrete and steel structure known as the “great wall of New Orleans”.
Its huge, 25ft yellow boom gates can swing shut in a few minutes to cut off a commercial canal and prevent a crescendo of water from the Gulf barreling into the heart of New Orleans, lying some 15 miles to the west.
By any measure, these defenses have performed well since Katrina, seeing off the threat of more recent hurricanes, such as Ida in 2021.
Standing on a parapet atop the hulking surge barrier on a typically steamy Louisiana June day, Jeff Williams looked out as a leviathan barge conveying equipment for Nasa’s Artemis III project, being constructed a short distance inside the barrier, chugged through the open gates.
The money spent on the surge barrier and Nasa’s Michoud assembly facility is evidence the federal government won’t just let New Orleans drown, believes Williams, who is the regional director of the Southeast Louisiana Flood Protection Authority, tasked with maintaining the flood defenses.
“I don’t believe it’s a lost cause – I believe it’s a question of investment,” he said.
“Southern Louisianans, long before this country ever even existed, have always adapted, always.
Technology has changed.
Engineering has changed.
So the adaptability is there.”
New Orleans is “culturally so significant” that the federal government, which has already spent $15bn on flood protections after Katrina, will spend even more to shore up defenses even if the tax bases shrinks further, Botts said.
But the cost of staying dry will add up, through new infrastructure and steepening insurance premiums.
“If everyone in New Orleans decides not to retreat, what would it take to stay – taxes on businesses, boats instead of cars, elevated homes?”
said AR Siders, an expert in coastal relocation at the University of Delaware.
“Something big has to change and people in New Orleans will have to choose to become like Venice or have 30ft levees and not see the coast.
Something will have to give.”
New Orleans could decide to just defend its historic, tourist-thronged core, or gradually shift its center of gravity northwards over decades with tax breaks and other incentives to encourage housing, businesses, schools and hospitals on higher ground, safer from inundation.
There is time.
But any measured approach would require the sort of long-term strategic commitment now rare in US politics.
“There is no blueprint at all for this.
I’ve been told before that retreat is un-American,” Siders said.
“Most glaringly there are no state-level plans for this – we are waiting for one state to be brave enough to commit and take action.”
“My fear,” Siders went on, “is that a lot of US towns are facing a slow death.
Slow demise is the default, not just for New Orleans but for Miami and Wilmington and lots of other places.
I’m worried we are all sitting around and hoping, playing chicken and hoping that someone else will come in and solve the problem later on.”
Such decisions about the future of places including New Orleans will be shaped by the unrelenting changes wrought by the climate crisis – as well as more human feelings of connection to home.
New Orleans is famed for jazz, Mardi Gras, beignets and its Creole culture.
But it is more than just this – it exists as a place of memories and family and belonging like almost every other city.
For many who live here, the onus is to cherish and to build rather than to contemplate retreat.
Speakers
9speakers63%attributed speech538writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice
100%flagged-word coverageBotts
37 attributed words4.1% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.