Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,435 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oliver Milman results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and False Dilemma , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 498 hits . Analysis detected 5,492 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,740 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,574 of 6,629 authors). This Oliver Milman is better (less manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group. Oliver Milman
Author details
Total words: 5,740
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.1% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 6.3% 6.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Author 6.3%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst