Speaker summary
⁠64%1 analyzed article/video55.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Botts results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Overconfidence Bias, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 185 faulty-reasoning hits from 55.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (8,463 of 28,364 speakers). This Botts is worse (more manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group.
Botts
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 55.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

70% percentile
025507510070.2% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos55.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos