Author summary
12% 1 analyzed article/video 1,145 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Samantha Wohlfeil results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , In-Group Bias , and Anchoring Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 288 hits . Analysis detected 1,658 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,435 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 38% (3,968 of 6,316 authors). This Samantha Wohlfeil is better (less manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group. Samantha Wohlfeil
Author details
Total words: 3,435
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.2% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 8.4% 8.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst