Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,141 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cate Latimer results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 545 hits . Analysis detected 3,669 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,564 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 16% (5,599 of 6,628 authors). This Cate Latimer is better (less manipulative) than 84.50% of the peer group. Cate Latimer
Author details
Total words: 8,564
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.5% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst