Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,264 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rosa Flores results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 37.8% saturation with 1,435 hits. Analysis detected 7,965 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,792 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of 90% (664 of 6,348 authors). This Rosa Flores is worse (more manipulative) than 89.60% of the peer group.
Rosa Flores
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
90%Rosa Flores (selected)7%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,792
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

90% percentile
025507510089.6% percentile
6.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 37.8%37.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 27.1%27.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 36.8%36.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 8.4%8.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 10.8%10.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.2%2.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.3%7.3%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Author 3.8%3.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Author 37.8%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Author 36.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 27.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Author 10.8%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.7%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Loss Aversion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Composition/Division: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos