Topic summary
22% 6 analyzed articles/videos 5,457 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Initiatives results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Optimism Bias , and Anecdotal , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 2,158 hits . Analysis detected 16,786 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,830 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (14,329 of 15,689 topics). This Community Initiatives is better (less manipulative) than 91.30% of the peer group. Community Initiatives
Topic details
Total words: 24,830
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.7% percentile 1.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles24.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 0.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst