Author summary
26% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,879 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Frida Garza results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 820 hits . Analysis detected 10,829 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,241 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 29% (4,640 of 6,500 authors). This Frida Garza is better (less manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group. Frida Garza
Author details
Total words: 13,241
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.6% percentile 1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst