RedState91%

Alaska Man Monday: Kids, Books, and Farmer's Markets 29%

By Ward Clark72%

6/29/2026, 12:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anecdotal, and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 108 hits. Analysis detected 1,064 faulty-reasoning hits from 566 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.1% and a BS Rank of 29% (15,725 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 71.80% of the article peer group.

Summer is in full swing, and thoughts of Alaskans have turned to fishing. 
We don’t have any big ocean-fishing outings planned this year, but the salmon and trout fishing right around here is pretty good, and fish is good for you. 
We’re not really big on catch and release, other than where there is a legal restriction. 
We fish for the freezer, and we generally have a lot of fish in there. 
On the school front: A Matanuska-Susitna Borough elementary school just closed. 
But there’s a silver lining: Free books for Mat-Su youngsters. 
Hundreds of books removed from one of Mat-Su’s permanently shuttered schools are on their way to local children through a summerlong literacy project in Palmer instead of being sent to the discard pile. 
About 100 boxes of books removed from the now-closed Meadow Lakes Elementary School and left behind by school families, teachers, and the district’s other librarians were given to Bright Lights Book Project volunteers earlier this month, said district spokesman John Notestine. 
They were immediately integrated into the organization’s new Summer in the Parks effort, Bright Lights officials said. 
The effort is part of a partnership between Bright Lights and the Matanuska-Susitna Borough School District that began last year and keeps books out of the shredder and in the community after they are no longer needed in schools, Notestine said. 
There’s nothing better for a young person’s mind, or indeed anyone’s mind, than reading. 
Nothing. 
So, a repurposing like this could yield some great benefits for young, growing Mat-Su minds. 
And, in a small community, nothing much goes to waste. 
I'd like to also make some suggestions for the borough high schools. 
How about having the kids read the Constitution and the Federalist Papers? 
Maybe assign Aristotle and Marcus Aurelius? 
Reading those as a young man influenced me greatly, including in some ways that didn’t become apparent until I was much older. 
Alaska Man score: 5 repurposed books. 
Here’s another great thing about our home in the Mat-Su: it’s summer, and the farmer’s markets are opening up with lots of fresh local Alaska produce. 
The Matanuska-Susitna Valley is Alaska’s top spot for farm-fresh summer vegetables. 
With summer in full swing, locals can take advantage of the bounty, too. 
But where can residents go to find Alaska-grown produce? 
Starting now, residents can find Mat-Su produce carried in Fred Meyer, Carrs and Three Bears Alaska locations throughout the valley, local farm bureau officials announced this week. 
But what about farm stands? 
To answer that question, the Mat-Su Sentinel compiled a list of Mat-Su farm stands and farmers markets that feature locally grown produce. 
This list includes only stands or locations with consistent hours and dates throughout the summer. 
Visit the listed websites to double-check that the location you want to visit is open before you head out. 
There’s a lot of trading going on, too. 
Here on our Susitna Valley homestead, the one crop we have in abundance is raspberries. 
Other folks locally grow not only veggies but also honey. 
There’s a fair amount of bartering, and my wife’s dandelion and raspberry wines are pretty popular; note that she cannot legally sell them, but an informal trade among friends? 
That’s perfectly OK, especially since we aren’t in a dry jurisdiction. 
Alaska Man score: 5 home-made raspberry scones. 
Now, let’s look at some unusual self-defense implements. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.3%Ward Clark: 6.5%RedState: 7.0%Confirmation Bias8.3%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.2%RedState: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Ward Clark: 4.6%RedState: 3.4%Availability Heuristic3.4%This article: 4.1%Ward Clark: 1.7%RedState: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic4.1%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.7%RedState: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Ward Clark: 3.1%RedState: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias4.6%This article: 13.6%Ward Clark: 8.2%RedState: 9.2%Framing Effect13.6%This article: 5.8%Ward Clark: 0.6%RedState: 0.5%Loss Aversion5.8%This article: 5.5%Ward Clark: 0.8%RedState: 0.4%Status Quo Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.1%RedState: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 18.0%Ward Clark: 3.0%RedState: 1.7%Optimism Bias18.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 1.3%RedState: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Ward Clark: 9.5%RedState: 13.9%Negativity Bias3.4%This article: 7.2%Ward Clark: 2.2%RedState: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias7.2%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.5%RedState: 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.1%RedState: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%Ward Clark: 5.7%RedState: 4.7%In-Group Bias1.8%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 1.9%RedState: 3.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 19.1%Ward Clark: 1.5%RedState: 2.0%Halo Effect19.1%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.4%RedState: 0.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.9%Ward Clark: 0.8%RedState: 1.2%Recency Bias1.9%This article: 1.4%Ward Clark: 0.4%RedState: 0.5%Primacy Effect1.4%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.0%RedState: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 3.9%RedState: 6.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 2.0%RedState: 2.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 10.6%Ward Clark: 2.4%RedState: 3.3%Appeal to Authority10.6%This article: 7.4%Ward Clark: 2.2%RedState: 2.4%False Dilemma7.4%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.0%RedState: 1.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.2%RedState: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.2%Ward Clark: 10.6%RedState: 10.1%Hasty Generalization3.2%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.4%RedState: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.3%Ward Clark: 0.3%RedState: 0.9%Bandwagon2.3%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 6.7%RedState: 8.5%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 2.5%Ward Clark: 1.3%RedState: 1.8%Begging the Question2.5%This article: 5.8%Ward Clark: 1.8%RedState: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.8%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 1.1%RedState: 0.9%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 1.0%RedState: 1.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.2%RedState: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.1%RedState: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 14.3%Ward Clark: 2.8%RedState: 2.6%Anecdotal14.3%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.3%RedState: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.4%Ward Clark: 1.6%RedState: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.4%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.1%RedState: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 4.8%Ward Clark: 0.4%RedState: 0.2%Special Pleading4.8%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.0%RedState: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 10.2%Ward Clark: 1.7%RedState: 2.4%Unattributed Quote10.2%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.6%RedState: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 7.6%Ward Clark: 19.9%RedState: 21.5%Biased Writer Voice7.6%This article: 3.2%Ward Clark: 6.8%RedState: 4.8%Indoctrination3.2%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 0.2%RedState: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ward Clark: 12.3%RedState: 15.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 10.6%Ward Clark: 2.9%RedState: 3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…10.6%

566 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers29%attributed speech403writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Notestine • 41 words • 100.0% coverageBright Lights officials • 17 words • 100.0% coverageJohn Notestine • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coveragelocal farm bureau officials • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageMat-Su Sentinel • 22 words • 100.0% coverageMat-Su Sentinel • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
27 attributed words17% of attributed speech89% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +97.3 ptsWriter: 2.7%local farm bureau officials: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-10.7 ptsWriter: 10.7%local farm bureau officials: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-4.5 ptsWriter: 4.5%local farm bureau officials: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.