Topic summary
⁠68%5 analyzed articles/videos1,969 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Canadian Politics results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 1,268 hits. Analysis detected 15,970 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,554 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (12,419 of 16,558 topics). This Canadian Politics is better (less manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group.
Canadian Politics
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510025.0% percentile
2.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles15.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.6%7.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos