Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Aaron Wherry results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 459 hits . Analysis detected 4,904 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,218 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,258 authors). This Aaron Wherry is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Aaron Wherry
Author details
Total words: 4,218
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.9% 9.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 7.4% 7.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.7% 2.7% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Author 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.8%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.8%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Author 7.4%, sitewide 1.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Tu Quoque: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Middle Ground: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst