Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,476 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel J. Samet results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 823 hits . Analysis detected 6,733 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,904 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 52% (3,206 of 6,628 authors). This Daniel J. Samet is worse (more manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group. Daniel J. Samet
Author details
Total words: 5,904
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.6% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.6% 7.6% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.9% 13.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.7% 5.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.9%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.1%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.7%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Composition/Division: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst