Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos65 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Catherine Cullen results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.5% saturation with 328 hits. Analysis detected 1,548 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,152 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of 89% (741 of 6,528 authors). This Catherine Cullen is worse (more manipulative) than 88.70% of the peer group.
Catherine Cullen
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
89%Catherine Cullen (selected)7%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,152
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

89% percentile
025507510088.7% percentile
6.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 28.5%28.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.9%6.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.9%11.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 19.7%19.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.4%2.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 4.0%4.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 8.0%8.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 28.5%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 19.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 11.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 8.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Author 8.0%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos