Topic summary
⁠53%2 analyzed articles/videos2,304 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anxiety Management results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Indoctrination, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 753 hits. Analysis detected 6,938 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,216 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (12,250 of 16,562 topics). This Anxiety Management is better (less manipulative) than 74.00% of the peer group.
Anxiety Management
Topic details
Total words: 9,216
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510026.0% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.2%8.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos