Topic summary
58% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,196 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Animal Rights results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Self-Serving Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 1,214 hits . Analysis detected 9,556 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,035 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 19% (13,545 of 16,562 topics). This Animal Rights is better (less manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group. Animal Rights
Topic details
Total words: 12,035
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.2% percentile 1.8% BS Score6 analyzed articles12K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst