Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,180 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Susanne Rust results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 665 hits. Analysis detected 3,851 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,720 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 52% (3,240 of 6,628 authors). This Susanne Rust is worse (more manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group.
Susanne Rust
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
52%Susanne Rust (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,720
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

51% percentile
025507510051.1% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.1%3.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 10.2%10.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.1%14.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.4%6.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos