Author summary
0%7 analyzed articles/videos5,760 analyzed words
BS Summary: These GERALD IMRAY results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 1,279 hits. Analysis detected 6,816 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,854 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 2% (6,156 of 6,244 authors). This GERALD IMRAY is better (less manipulative) than 98.60% of the peer group.
GERALD IMRAY
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
2%GERALD IMRAY (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 21,854
Article count: 7
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

1% percentile
02550751001.4% percentile
1.0% BS Score7 analyzed articles21.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.0%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate