Author summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos4,050 analyzed words
BS Summary: These MONIKA PRONCZUK results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 1,545 hits. Analysis detected 6,454 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,014 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (6,211 of 6,364 authors). This MONIKA PRONCZUK is better (less manipulative) than 97.60% of the peer group.
MONIKA PRONCZUK
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠3%MONIKA PRONCZUK (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 15,014
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

2% percentile
02550751002.4% percentile
1.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles15K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.3%10.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos