Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,386 analyzed words
BS Summary: These MOLLY QUELL results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 486 hits . Analysis detected 2,586 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,544 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 15% (5,451 of 6,348 authors). This MOLLY QUELL is better (less manipulative) than 85.90% of the peer group. MOLLY QUELL
Author details
Total words: 5,544
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.8% 8.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst