Author summary
91% 1 analyzed article/video 1,920 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aaron Mesh results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 1,007 hits . Analysis detected 6,639 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,760 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (2,802 of 6,226 authors). This Aaron Mesh is worse (more manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group. Aaron Mesh
Author details
Total words: 5,760
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.0% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 17.5% 17.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 4.4% 4.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 8.5% 8.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 17.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.6%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.7%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst