Speaker summary
33%10 analyzed articles/videos162 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wired results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 47% saturation with 213 hits. Analysis detected 627 faulty-reasoning hits from 162 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 15.4% and a BS Rank of 23% (21,325 of 27,649 speakers). This Wired is better (less manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

23% percentile
025507510022.9% percentile
15.4% BS Score10 analyzed videos162 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 47.0%47.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 16.8%16.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 17.9%17.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 4.2%4.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 5.1%5.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 9.5%9.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 47.0%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate