Author summary
42% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,528 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jackson Chen results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Unattributed Quote , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 564 hits . Analysis detected 4,835 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,400 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (2,547 of 6,244 authors). This Jackson Chen is worse (more manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group. Jackson Chen
Author details
Total words: 5,400
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.2% percentile 3.0% BS Score6 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.4% 10.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 7.8% 7.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 7.8%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst